Subject	Thats what I ment by slightly diffrent guess its a big dif. (n/m)
Posted by	NONE on September 26, 2001 at 7:57 AM
	This message has been viewed 16 times.
In Reply To	I believe they used the same turbo, not engine>> posted by Mike ZZZ (Toronto) on September 26, 2001 at 07:32 AM
Message
Follow Ups	Run in w/Typhoon on the commute this morning (long)... - DG 05:47:46 09/26/01 IMHO, stock for stock, they will take an NA in a - toyluvr 06:00:23 09/26/01 I believe it (n/m) - DG 06:15:22 09/26/01 0-60 5.2 sec can run 3 bar on stock motor (n/m) - NSANY(ATL) 06:43:02 09/26/01 3 bar is about 44psi. (n/m) - TTony 07:32:09 09/26/01 Actually it's 43.5113232, Should have put 30psi, my bad (n/m) - NSANY(ATL) 07:49:28 09/26/01 I was just rounding up... (n/m) - TTony 09:09:02 09/26/01 don't those things have the old Grand National engines - Bernie 07:15:15 09/26/01 Slightly difrent and the Typhoon was water to air intercool (n/m) - NONE 07:17:50 09/26/01 The GN had a 3.7L Typhoons had a 4.3L (n/m) - NSANY(ATL) 07:21:39 09/26/01 GN had a 3.8 actually (n/m) - Only1Z 09:42:33 09/26/01 I believe they used the same turbo, not engine>> - Mike ZZZ (Toronto) 07:32:08 09/26/01 Thats what I ment by slightly diffrent guess its a big dif. (n/m) - NONE 07:57:22 09/26/01 great sleeper. can put most cars to shame in acceleration. (n/m) - twinz 08:17:51 09/26/01 Are those cartoons on your plates in your sig? lol (n/m) - oOEverOo 08:24:16 09/26/01 HEh...nah, Zig Zag filter (if I remember correctly) in PS (n/m) - DG 09:02:47 09/26/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.